menu-close
RussiaApril 8 2025, 4:49 am

Putin Apologists Falsely Claim NATO Broke Promise With “Not One Inch” Phrase

On 7 April 2025, MSNBC pub­lished an opin­ion piece by LSE pro­fes­sor Kristi­na Spohr ana­lyz­ing how Russ­ian sup­port­ers mis­use the phrase “not one inch east­ward” to blame West­ern nations for Putin’s aggres­sion in Ukraine. The arti­cle begins:

At a time when NATO faces per­haps its great­est chal­lenge, the ques­tion of its so-called “expan­sion” at the end of the Cold War remains very much alive. The two mat­ters are, in fact, close­ly entwined. NATO’s ene­mies — both in Rus­sia and now, sad­ly, in and around the White House — con­tin­ue to deploy spu­ri­ous argu­ments to weak­en the alliance and jus­ti­fy Vladimir Putin’s brazen war of aggres­sion against Ukraine. The flawed argu­ment about NATO expan­sion flows from two false premis­es. One is that in Feb­ru­ary 1990, when then‑U.S. Sec­re­tary of State James Bak­er uttered the words “not one inch east­ward,” he alleged­ly “promised” Sovi­et leader Mikhail Gor­bachev that the Amer­i­can-led defense alliance would not enlarge…

Read more

Key Points

  • Bak­er’s “not one inch” com­ment was part of explorato­ry talks about Ger­man reuni­fi­ca­tion, not a promise about NATO’s future borders.
  • East­ern Euro­pean nations vol­un­tar­i­ly sought NATO mem­ber­ship due to fears of Russ­ian expan­sion­ism, exer­cis­ing their sov­er­eign rights.
  • Putin rejects the con­cept of “sov­er­eign equal­i­ty” of states and aims to divide the Euro-Atlantic alliance through hybrid warfare.
  • Euro­pean lead­ers are invest­ing in their own defense capa­bil­i­ties as Amer­i­ca’s reli­a­bil­i­ty as a secu­ri­ty part­ner has been eroded.

 

Dis­claimer GIOR uti­lizes AI to gen­er­ate sum­maries of news items, includ­ing the intro­duc­tion and the key points that fol­low. Any text fol­low­ing the key points is con­text added by GIOR edi­tors. Please ver­i­fy all infor­ma­tion before using. Images are also AI-gen­er­at­ed and are for illus­tra­tive pur­pos­es only—they are meant to rep­re­sent the events or indi­vid­u­als con­cerned but should not be under­stood as “real-world” photography.